This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
A promising prototype for architectural education Read full »
Which schools are best preparing students for success in architecture? Read full »
An optimistic assessment on the future of the design professions Read full »
The following criteria were used to score world-class programs:
Category 1: Results of the 2009 DesignIntelligence rankings by professional practices.
Category 2: Results of the 10 years of DesignIntelligence rankings by professional practices, with more weight given to more recent years.
Category 3: Results ofDesignIntelligence deans surveys from 2007, 2008, and 2009, which solicits opinions about respected programs as well as outstanding educators and education leaders.
Category 4: Greenway Group independent analysis and opinion of overall campus environment for learning, technology resources, opportunities for integrated learning, and joint degree programs. Also incorporates student evaluations.
Category 5: DesignIntelligence considers National Architectural Accrediting Board accreditation to be a minimum standard for world-class status. NAAB analysis provides for a single standard for both undergraduate and graduate programs, so a standard score was used for each program.
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- AR Issues: Architecture That Goes Beyond Style Wars | ArchDaily ow.ly/LHwCh23 hours ago by @dinet
- Zaha Hadid’s 3D Printed Flame Heels Among 5 Designs to Re-Invent the Shoe | ArchDaily ow.ly/LF7bJ1 day ago by @dinet
- Inconvenient Truths About The Apple Watch — Medium ow.ly/LE0TU1 day ago by @dinet