This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
Tackling the ubiquitous, disruptive nature of exponentially increasing computing power Read full »
A promising prototype for architectural education Read full »
The following criteria were used to score world-class programs:
Results of the 2010 DesignIntelligence landscape architecture rankings by professional practices.
Historical results of the six years of DesignIntelligence landscape architecture rankings by professional practices.
Results of DesignIntelligence landscape architecture deans and chairs surveys from 2008, 2009, and 2010, which solicits opinions about respected programs as well as outstanding educators and education leaders.
Independent analysis and opinion by DesignIntelligence editors and Greenway Group analysts of overall campus environment for learning, technology resources, opportunities for integrated learning, skills assessment, and regional preference derived from surveys.
DesignIntelligence considers Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board accreditation to be a minimum standard for world-class status. LAAB analysis provides for a single standard for both undergraduate and graduate programs, so a standard score was used for each program.
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- The best commencement speeches you may have missed - The Washington Post ow.ly/AQNL300EJDp
- Rome Asks for $550 Million in Private Donations to Keep Its Monuments Standing - CityLab ow.ly/u7lA300EJwx
- Lucas Verweij asks why designers whine about design thinking ow.ly/7rp0300F2oW