A brutal fact of reality for architecture and engineering firms is that prevailing pricing and compensation methods—setting fees on the basis of direct labor cost (whether selling hours on a time-and-materials or lump-sum basis)—provide only minimal profits for most firms.
This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
Tackling the ubiquitous, disruptive nature of exponentially increasing computing power Read full »
U.S.-based multinational firms are thriving in a growing global market Read full »
How Gensler maintains quality, culture while expanding globally Read full »
A promising prototype for architectural education Read full »
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- Will The Internet Of Things Be A Privacy Nightmare? ow.ly/OWddj12 hours ago by @dinet
- Rick Fedrizzi to Step Down as USGBC’s CEO End of 2016 | U.S. Green Building Council ow.ly/OWc9U15 hours ago by @dinet
- Foster + Partners Win Competition to Design Cardiff Interchange | ArchDaily ow.ly/OWOP516 hours ago by @dinet