A brutal fact of reality for architecture and engineering firms is that prevailing pricing and compensation methods—setting fees on the basis of direct labor cost (whether selling hours on a time-and-materials or lump-sum basis)—provide only minimal profits for most firms.
This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
Since its nascence, the practice of architecture’s success centered on the individual and collective talents of those who comprised the design studio. Read full »
On the risk-reward scale, it easily can be said that design professionals take on tremendous risk for little reward. Read full »
A destabilization of older markets yields new zones of opportunity Read full »
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- A tradition of classical architecture in California | OUPblog ow.ly/RiZW300AegT4 hours ago by @dinet
- Two Qualities You Need to Succeed in an Architecture Career | ArchDaily ow.ly/zvik300zNT07 hours ago by @dinet
- How To Uncover Strategic Leadership In Your Company - Forbes ow.ly/2aoC300zmg09 hours ago by @dinet