A brutal fact of reality for architecture and engineering firms is that prevailing pricing and compensation methods—setting fees on the basis of direct labor cost (whether selling hours on a time-and-materials or lump-sum basis)—provide only minimal profits for most firms.
This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
U.S.-based multinational firms are thriving in a growing global market Read full »
How Gensler maintains quality, culture while expanding globally Read full »
A promising prototype for architectural education Read full »
An optimistic assessment on the future of the design professions Read full »
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- Car Talk Deems Buckminster Fuller’s Dymaxion Car a Complete Failure | ArchDaily ow.ly/MvwdL15 hours ago by @dinet
- Drone Graffiti, Drone Photography, Drone Instagram, and More - CityLab ow.ly/Mu04416 hours ago by @dinet
- Which Architectural Software Should You Be Using? | ArchDaily ow.ly/Mu00a19 hours ago by @dinet